Theoretical Foundations of Advanced Nursing

Theoretical Foundations of Advanced Nursing

see attached.

Topic 1: Nursing Philosophy and Models
Select one of the nursing theorists “Florence Nightingale: Modern Nursing” and respond to the following:
•    Describe the historical background of the development of the model or framework.
•    Identify the concepts in the model.
•    Describe the relationship between the model and concepts in nursing’s metaparadigm…metaparadigm concepts (person, health, nursing, and environment)
•    Create an example of the model applied to clinical practice.
•    Identify strengths and weaknesses of the model for clinical practice.

Textbook Information

Title:               Nursing Theorists and Their Work 8th ed.
Author:           Alligood, M. R.
ISBN:              978-0-323-09194-7
Publisher:      Mosby Elsevier

Order Description

Order Description

Short’Writing’Task’4:’Style’Task (500’words)

The goal of this task is to draft an introduction for your essay and a body paragraph from you essay.
The introductory paragraph should contain;
an interesting hook and an explanation of the problem or debate that is the focus of the essay. (1 mark)
contain a clear, interesting and complex statement that can be supported by a rhetorical analysis ( 2 marks) – indicate the overall method or outline of the essay (1 mark)

The Body Paragraph should : !
– Focus on a particular aspect of the overall argument (1 mark)
Engage with evidence to display advanced critical thinking (2 marks)
Draw a strong connection between evidence and overall argument (1 mark)
Both paragraphs should be written in a style engaging an academic readership (1 mark) while accurately citing and referencing sources mentioned in the paragraphs (1 mark)

On a separate page at the end of your submission for Short writing task 4 you must include a reference list or works cited list conforming to the requirements of a style; see page 1. You can use the sources you used in your previous short writing tasks as well as any paragraphs/ sentences written for assessment tasks in your course.

Order Description

Order Description

Short’Writing’Task’4:’Style’Task (500’words)

The goal of this task is to draft an introduction for your essay and a body paragraph from you essay.
The introductory paragraph should contain;
an interesting hook and an explanation of the problem or debate that is the focus of the essay. (1 mark)
contain a clear, interesting and complex statement that can be supported by a rhetorical analysis ( 2 marks) – indicate the overall method or outline of the essay (1 mark)

The Body Paragraph should : !
– Focus on a particular aspect of the overall argument (1 mark)
Engage with evidence to display advanced critical thinking (2 marks)
Draw a strong connection between evidence and overall argument (1 mark)
Both paragraphs should be written in a style engaging an academic readership (1 mark) while accurately citing and referencing sources mentioned in the paragraphs (1 mark)

On a separate page at the end of your submission for Short writing task 4 you must include a reference list or works cited list conforming to the requirements of a style; see page 1. You can use the sources you used in your previous short writing tasks as well as any paragraphs/ sentences written for assessment tasks in your course.

Ethics Case Anaylsis

Ethics Case Anaylsis

Order Description

Ethics Case Analysis: ***This assignment focuses on the review of an ethics case problem solving the type of case, breach in standard, application and integration of ethical theory, and final and/or
proposed resolution.

Each student will analyze an actual court case utilizing the following format:

***Type of case (e.g.) Tort
***Breach in standard
***Implications for agency/institution
***Actions taken by supervisor or institution to address the concern
***Organizational changes made to prevent another occurrence
***Monitoring established to assure compliance

Ethics Case Anaylsis

Ethics Case Anaylsis

Order Description

Ethics Case Analysis: ***This assignment focuses on the review of an ethics case problem solving the type of case, breach in standard, application and integration of ethical theory, and final and/or
proposed resolution.

Each student will analyze an actual court case utilizing the following format:

***Type of case (e.g.) Tort
***Breach in standard
***Implications for agency/institution
***Actions taken by supervisor or institution to address the concern
***Organizational changes made to prevent another occurrence
***Monitoring established to assure compliance

Historical Essay #1: Confederation and Constitution

Historical Essay #1: Confederation and Constitution

Order Description

ollow instructions exactly.

Historical Essay #1: Confederation and Constitution (due Week 4)

As depression struck the new nation in the mid-1780s, new questions arose about the nature of American democracy. Many conservatives believed that the answer lay in a stronger national government. Most radicals believed it was up to the states to relieve the financial burden of the people. These sentiments fostered a movement for a new constitution. Political differences soon stimulated the creation of political parties.

Compare and contrast the Articles of Confederation with the new Constitution of 1787. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the Articles vis-à-vis the Constitution? Give specific instances that demonstrate the weakness of the Articles (such as the Western problem).

Then analyze the drafting of the Constitution, using specific details to show how the various states (slave vs. free, east vs. west) compromised in order to effectively draft a constitution. Pay particular attention to Roger Sherman’s plan, the Great Compromise, which broke a stalemate that could have been fatal to the development of the new Constitution.

Finally, compare and contrast the debate over ratification between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Make sure you cite specific examples from the Federalist Papers to support the Federalist position and contrast it with leading proponents of the opposition (such as John Hancock). Analyze how the debate over a bill of rights illustrates the differences between the two parties. Evaluate the relative success of the Bill of Rights in achieving an effective balance between national and states’ interests.

This paper must be four to five double-spaced pages in length (not including the References page) and utilize no less than four academic quality sources. Margins should be no more than one inch (right and left) and the essay should be composed in an appropriate font and size. Sources must be documented and cited using APA format.

Historical Essay #1: Confederation and Constitution

Historical Essay #1: Confederation and Constitution

Order Description

ollow instructions exactly.

Historical Essay #1: Confederation and Constitution (due Week 4)

As depression struck the new nation in the mid-1780s, new questions arose about the nature of American democracy. Many conservatives believed that the answer lay in a stronger national government. Most radicals believed it was up to the states to relieve the financial burden of the people. These sentiments fostered a movement for a new constitution. Political differences soon stimulated the creation of political parties.

Compare and contrast the Articles of Confederation with the new Constitution of 1787. What were the strengths and weaknesses of the Articles vis-à-vis the Constitution? Give specific instances that demonstrate the weakness of the Articles (such as the Western problem).

Then analyze the drafting of the Constitution, using specific details to show how the various states (slave vs. free, east vs. west) compromised in order to effectively draft a constitution. Pay particular attention to Roger Sherman’s plan, the Great Compromise, which broke a stalemate that could have been fatal to the development of the new Constitution.

Finally, compare and contrast the debate over ratification between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Make sure you cite specific examples from the Federalist Papers to support the Federalist position and contrast it with leading proponents of the opposition (such as John Hancock). Analyze how the debate over a bill of rights illustrates the differences between the two parties. Evaluate the relative success of the Bill of Rights in achieving an effective balance between national and states’ interests.

This paper must be four to five double-spaced pages in length (not including the References page) and utilize no less than four academic quality sources. Margins should be no more than one inch (right and left) and the essay should be composed in an appropriate font and size. Sources must be documented and cited using APA format.

Socrates’ self-defense at his trial (by the Athenian governing body

Socrates’ self-defense at his trial (by the Athenian governing body

Can you reconcile Socrates’ self-defense at his trial (by the Athenian governing body) with his teaching that called for one to “know thyself” (know oneself)?

(Use what you have learned in class about Socrates to either make the case or deny it.)

Socrates’ self-defense at his trial (by the Athenian governing body

Socrates’ self-defense at his trial (by the Athenian governing body

Can you reconcile Socrates’ self-defense at his trial (by the Athenian governing body) with his teaching that called for one to “know thyself” (know oneself)?

(Use what you have learned in class about Socrates to either make the case or deny it.)

Presidential Election System

Presidential Election System

Order Description

Write a five-page paper (this is the length of the body and does not include the works cited page) on the following topic.

Topic: Explain why an individual can win the most popular vote and yet not win the presidential election in the United States. Discuss the suggestions for changing the present system.

You must use a minimum of five different sources and cite them within this paper as well as list them on the works cited page using the MLA fomat. One of the five sources must be your text book and at least one of the other four sources must be another book.

Reference:
Dautrich, K., and Yalof, D., The Enduring Democracy, Custom 3rd Edition, 2013, Cengage Learning.

Attention!

Using this service is LEGAL and IS NOT prohibited by any university/college policies.

You are allowed to use the original model paper you will receive in the following ways:

  1. As a source for additional understanding of the subject
  2. As a source of ideas / reasoning for your own research (if properly referenced)
  3. For proper paraphrasing (see your educational institution's definition of plagiarism and acceptable paraphrase)
  4. Direct citing (if referenced properly)

Thank you very much for respecting our authors' copyrights.

Site Management